JESUS IS A BLACK
MAN (A-JEW)
‘Africa is the mother of Christianity’
In Song of Solomon chapter 1:5-6. King Solomon is black (dark
but beautiful) if so, then his father David will also be black. And if David is
black, then his descendants will be black. Jesus is the root of David so said
the Bible, therefore Jesus is definitely black too. But this book is far beyond
colour issue because Jesus was, is and will remain a combination of all races
and represented them all because he is God that works in mysterious ways.
According to Matthew 24:14, Jesus will not return until the revelation of the
mystery, which was kept secret since the world began, is made manifest and the
gospel of the kingdom preached in the whole world as a testimony to all
nations, and then the end will come..
If we don't
consider or regard his natural skin by birth then we may be deceived by the
coming of the Anti-Christ and our brethren in Catholic will never stop to bow
and worship the image of Cesare Borgia who they painted as Jesus and turn his
sanctuary to shrine of idols. Deuteronomy 5:8, 1 John
2:18, 2 Thessalonians 2:3-4, Daniel 7:25
Now to him that is of power to establish you according to my
gospel, and the preaching of Jesus Christ, according to the revelation of the
mystery, which was kept secret since the world began, But now is made manifest,
and by the scriptures of the prophets, according to the commandment of the
everlasting God, made known to all nations for the obedience of faith: To God
only wise, be glory through Jesus Christ for ever. Amen. Romans 16:25-27
Who has believed our report? and to whom is the arm of the
LORD revealed? Isaiah 53:1
…he has no
form nor comeliness; and when we shall see him, there is no beauty that we
should desire him. Isaiah 53:2
And Pilate asked him, “Are you the King of the Jews?” And
he answered him, “You have said so.” Mark
15:2
"You are a king, then!" said Pilate. Jesus
answered, "You say that I am a king. In fact, the reason I was born and
came into the world is to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth
listens to me." John 18:37
As
many were astonied at thee; his visage was so marred more than any man, and his
form more than the sons of men: Isaiah 52:14
Solomon's declaration, I am black, but comely, O ye daughters of
Jerusalem' (Sol, I, 5), is often cited as referring to Christ.
According to the bible itself, then, Jesus Christ was a black man.
Was Jesus a Jew ethnically, or was his mother a Jew? Jesus
clearly identified with the Jews of His day, His physical people and tribe, and
their religion (although correcting its errors). God purposely sent Him to
Judah: “He came to His own [Judah], and His own [Judah] did not receive Him.
But as many [Jews] as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children
of God, to those who believe in His name... (John 1:11-12
NKJV), and He clearly said,
"You [Gentiles] worship what you do not know; we [Jews] know what we
[Jews] worship, for salvation is of the Jews” (John 4:22)
The very first verse of
the New Testament clearly proclaims the Jewish ethnicity of Jesus. “The book of
the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham” (Matthew 1:1). It is evident from
passages like Hebrews 7:14, “For it is clear that
our Lord descended from Judah,” that Jesus descended from the tribe of Judah,
from which we get the name “Jew.” And what about Mary, the mother of Jesus? In
the genealogy in Luke chapter 3, we see clearly that Mary was a direct descendant
of King David which gave Jesus the legal right to ascend the Jewish throne as
well as establishing without any doubt that Jesus was a Jew ethnically.
Was Jesus an observant Jew religiously? Both of Jesus' parents had “done everything required by the Law of the Lord” (Luke 2:39). His aunt and uncle, Zechariah and Elizabeth, were also Torah-observant Jews (Luke 1:6), so we can see that probably the whole family took their Jewish faith very seriously.
In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5–7), Jesus continually affirmed the authority of the Torah and the Prophets (Matthew 5:17) even in the Kingdom of Heaven (Matthew 5:19-20). He regularly attended synagogue (Luke 4:16), and His teaching was respected by the other Jews of His day (Luke 4:15). He taught in the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem (Luke 21:37), and if He were not a Jew, His going into that part of the Temple would simply not have been allowed (Acts 21:28-30).
Was Jesus an observant Jew religiously? Both of Jesus' parents had “done everything required by the Law of the Lord” (Luke 2:39). His aunt and uncle, Zechariah and Elizabeth, were also Torah-observant Jews (Luke 1:6), so we can see that probably the whole family took their Jewish faith very seriously.
In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5–7), Jesus continually affirmed the authority of the Torah and the Prophets (Matthew 5:17) even in the Kingdom of Heaven (Matthew 5:19-20). He regularly attended synagogue (Luke 4:16), and His teaching was respected by the other Jews of His day (Luke 4:15). He taught in the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem (Luke 21:37), and if He were not a Jew, His going into that part of the Temple would simply not have been allowed (Acts 21:28-30).
Jesus also displayed
the outward signs of being an observant Jew. He wore tzitzit (tassles) on His clothing (Luke 8:44; Matthew 14:36) to serve as a
reminder of the commandments (Numbers 15:37-39). He observed Passover
(John 2:13) and went up to
Jerusalem (Deuteronomy
16:16) on this very important Jewish pilgrimage feast day.
He observed Succoth, or the feast of tabernacles (John 7:2, 10) and went up to Jerusalem (John 7:14) as required in the
Torah. He also observed Hanukkah, the festival of lights (John 10:22) and probably Rosh
Hashanah, the feast of trumpets (John 5:1), going up to
Jerusalem on both those occasions as well, even though it isn't commanded in
the Torah. Clearly, Jesus identified Himself as a Jew (John 4:22) and as King of the
Jews (Mark 15:2). From His birth to His last Passover Seder (Luke 22:14-15), Jesus lived as an
observant Jew.
The question might arise in the mind of
the reader: "Well, the argument of Kersey Graves sounds plausible enough,
but really we need a great deal more corroborative evidence before we can give
his conclusions more than palling notice?" This question, the writer
believes, is justified. In questions of historical controversy only the most
careful consideration of evidence should satisfy us.
To say that the early pictures and images
of the Virgin Mary and the infant Jesus represent them with black complexions
is not enough. Our statement must be backed up by archaeological evidence. This
evidence, fortunately, was collected by the Great British Orientalist, Sir
Godfrey Higgins, and has been preserved for posterity in his monumental work, The Anacalypsis, or An Inquiry into the Origin of
Languages, Nations and Religions.
Sir Godfrey Higgins informs us that
"In all the Romish (Catholic) countries of Europe, France, Italy, Germany,
etc., the God Christ, as well as his mother, are described in their old
pictures to be black. The infant God in the arms of his black mother, his eyes
and drapery white, is himself perfectly black. If the reader doubts my word he
may go to the Cathedral at Moulins—to the famous Chapel of the Virgin at
Loretto—to the Church of the Annunciata—the Church at St. Lazaro or the Church
of St. Stephen at Genoa—to St. Francisco at Pisa—to the Church at Brixen in
Tyrol and to that at Padua—to the Church of St. Theodore at Munich—to a church
and to the Cathedral at Augsburg, where a black virgin and child as large as
life—to Rome and the Borghese chapel of Maria Maggiore—to the Pantheon—to a
small chapel of St. Peters on the right hand side on entering, near the door;
and in fact, to almost innumerable other churches in countries professing the
Romish religion.
"There is scarcely an old church in
Italy where some remains of the worship of the black virgin and black child are
not to be met with. Very often the black figures have given way to white ones
and in these cases the black ones, as being held sacred, were put into retired
places in the churches, but were not destroyed, and are yet to be found there…
"When the circumstance has been named
to the Romish priests they have endeavored to disguise the fact by pretending
that the child had become black by the smoke of candles; but it was black where
the smoke of a candle never came and, besides, how came the candles not to
blacken the white of the eyes, the teeth and the shirt, and to redden the lips?
Their real blackness is not to be questioned.
"… A black virgin and child among the
white Germans, Swiss, French and Italians" (The Anacalypsis, Vol. I, Book IV, Chap.I). Mr. J.A. Rogers, the well-known traveler and
journalist, has seen quite a large number of these black images of the Madonna
and infant in his European travels and has discovered that some of the images
possess African features. Evidently early
Christians must have thought that Jesus Christ was a member of the Ethiopian
race or they would not have so stressed the dark hue of the skin of the
Savior and his mother in their pictures and statues.
According to Christian dogma, Jesus is the Son of God. Since children are,
as a rule, similar in complexion to their parents it is reasonable to assume
that God also is black. This conclusion is both logical and scientific.
"There is a strong reason the think," declares Joseph McCabe,
"that man was at first very dark of skin, wooly haired and flat
nosed." And since the bible tells us that man was created in God's image,
then beyond all doubt God must be of dark complexion with unmistakably African
features.
Some of my friends have suggested that
should it be generally believed in these United States that either Jesus or
Jehovah was of sable hue that the Christian church would soon go out of
business.
They reason that white citizens of the
nation, on account of race prejudice, would have absolutely no use for a black
God: and the colored citizens would not have any confidence in an Ethiopian God
who had so long neglected his own race of people. However, I do not think such
a situation will come to pass, for the overwhelming majority of people do not
believe what is plausible or what is true; they believe what is comforting or
pleasing.
Undeniable Biblical Proof That Yahusha (Jesus) Is
Black
All of our lives, we have been taught that Jesus was a
blue eyed, blond haired, white man. This image of a white messiah appears in
churches all across the Americas, especially in the black church. But as
accepted as this image which has been presented to us may be, it is false. Not
only was the messiah black, but everyone
mentioned in the bible was black. From Adam to Paul, the writings in the
book that we call the “bible” were all written by people of color.
Although color is a subject that highly avoided in
today’s white supremest society; the Bible contains detailed narratives on the physical appearances and skin color of God’s
chosen people — the Hebrew Israelites. But in order to stay on topic, I will
only be discussing the color of the Messiah, who the world calls Jesus.
Please note that this has nothing to with race or
black pride, this is only about getting the truth out to our people so they can
wake up from the lies. So if you’re a seeker of truth, then journey with me as
I travel through history and prove without a shadow of a doubt that Jesus
was a black.
White
Washing Black History
Prior to the 1400’s, the ruling nation of Europe and
all of the known world worshiped a black Messiah. From the first century of
when the messiah hit the scene preaching the good news to the Israelites, all
the way up until the late 1400’s when black people were ruling Europe; everyone
living during those time periods were very aware that Yahusha, who the world
now calls Jesus, was a black man.
Many well noted history books such as From Babylon to Timbuktu, The Black Hebrews and The Black Christ, Blacked Out Through Whitewashed, etc. that document the history of the
different nations of people who lived in ancient times, all attest to the fact
that the Hebrew Messiah of the bible was indeed a black man. It wasn’t until
the year 1492, when the Romans conquered the Moors (Hebrew Israelites from the
tribe of Judah who were ruling Europe) that the image of the Messiah began to
change from black to white.
With the Moors out of the picture, the Europeans
immediately began whitewashing all of the black history in Europe, replacing
all of the original black images of the Messiah and our people, with white
images of their people; to instill White Supremacy throughout Europe. To add
insult to injury, the blacks who were now considered second class citizens,
were forbidden to educate themselves and had to learn their history from their
oppressors. This would further destroy them because the only way that black
people would be able to learn, would now be through images.
According to David Freedberg, in his work: The Power of Images, “Pictures were justified because they were the books
of the illiterate…and writers like Martin Luther [a white Christian] emphasized
the value of pictures which showed histories. Histories, in the broad sense,
meant pictures and sculptures with narrative subjects from the Bible.” So after
the Hebrews that were living in Europe were conquered, the new class of
illiterate blacks had to learn a whitewashed history; a history they would not
know was originally their own. This method of brainwashing through whitewashing
then became the norm, and spread from Europe all the way to the Americas.
When the Europeans took our ancestors from the coast
of Africa and brought us to the foreign lands of the Americas; the first thing
they did was brainwash our minds. They stripped us of our identity, gave us new
names, forbade us from speaking our Hebrew language, forbade us from worshiping
Yahuah and even forbade us to read the bible so they couldn’t discover the
truth. The religion of the Christianity and the image of a White Jesus was then
forced upon our ancestor’s, and as time passed; our people forgot who they were
and accepted the culture of America, it’s Christian religion, and it’s white
Jesus. They then passed their beliefs down to us, causing us to believe that
the Messiah was white too.
By convincing us that the son of God was white; we
automatically associated whiteness with superiority and blackness with
inferiority. They then used our low self-esteem against us, to make us think
that we should be grateful to be the slaves of a white man. Although we are no
longer slaves, many of our people still have this mentality today where they
feel privileged and honored to be in the presence of a white man. They do this
because it has been embedded into their minds through religious programming that
God is white; therefore his people must be white. But none of these lies that
White America has taught us is true, especially about the color of Yahusha
(Jesus).
More
Proof That The Messiah Was Black
The famous first century writer Josephus (37-100 A.D.)
penned the earliest non-biblical testimony of whom we now call Jesus. Josephus
was a (black) Jew who lived around the time of the Messiah and he reportedly
had access to official Roman records in which he based his information and his
work from. In his work, “the human form of Jesus and his wonderful works”,
Josephus discussed the true color of the messiah being black. However, his
texts were passed through the hands of (white) European christian leaders who
altered them to hide the truth about the messiah and who is people were.
Fortunately, however, Biblical scholar Robert Eisler in a classic 1931 study of
“Josephus’s Testimony” was able to reconstruct the unaltered testimony based on
a newly-discovered Old Russian translation that preserved the original Greek
text. According to Eisler’s reconstruction, the oldest non-Biblical description
of Jesus read as follows:
“At that time also there appeared a certain man of
magic power … if it be meet to call him a man, [whose name is Jesus], whom
[certain] Greeks call a son of [a] God, but his disciples [call] the true
prophet … he was a man of simple appearance, mature age, black-skinned
(melagchrous), short growth, three cubits tall, hunchbacked, prognathous (lit.
‘with a long face’ [macroprosopos]), a long nose, eyebrows meeting above the
nose … with scanty [curly] hair, but having a line in the middle of the head
after the fashion of the Nazaraeans, with an undeveloped beard.”
This short, black-skinned, mature, hunchbacked Jesus
with a unibrow, short curly hair and undeveloped beard bears no resemblance to
the Jesus Christ taken for granted today by most of the Christian world: the
tall, long haired, long bearded, white-skinned and blue eyed Son of God. Yet,
this earliest textual record matches well the earliest iconographic evidence.
The earliest visual depiction of Jesus is a painting that was found in 1921 on
a wall of the baptismal chamber of the house-church at Dura Europos, Syria and
dated around 235 A.D. This picture of Jesus is called “Healing the Paralytic
Man” (Mark 2:1-12) and displays him as being short and dark-skinned with a
small curly afro. This description has now been supported by the new
science of forensic anthropology.
In 2002 British forensic scientists and Israeli
archaeologists reconstructed what they believe is the most accurate image of
Jesus based off of data obtained from the mulch-disciplinary approach. In December
2002 Popular Science Magazine published a cover story on the findings which
confirm that Jesus would have been short, around 5’7-5’9, hair “short with
tight curls,” a weather-beaten face “which would have made him appear older,”
dark eyes and complexion: “he probably looked a great deal more like a
dark-skinned Semite than Westerners are used to seeing,” they concluded. The
textual, visual, and scientific evidence agrees, then: Jesus likely was a
short, dark-skinned Hebrew Israelite with short curly (wooly) hair and dark
eyes.
Now that we have traced back the historical figure and
color of Yahusha (whom the world calls Jesus) as being black, then just who is
the blued eyed, blond haired white European looking dude in all of the
paintings?
Caesar
Borgia
All
of the images and paintings that were displayed in churches today are of a guy
by the name of Caesar Borgia. in case you’ve never heard of this name before,
Cesare Borgia was an Italian Mobster and Captain in the Papal Military during
the 1500’s. He was also the son of Pope Alexander VI, of Rome. In an effort to
keep black slaves oppressed so that they could sustain their rulership in Rome,
Pope Alexander VI hired Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo to paint all of the
images of The Black Christ in Europe in the image of his son Cesare Borgia.
Since both of these artists were well known, a
competition broke out between the two, to see who could impress the Pope more
by making a new image the Pope’s son that would deceive the world into thinking
that Cesare was Jesus. So the majority of the images displaying the White
European looking Jesus that we see in paintings today at churches and Christian
stores, is actually a picture of Cesare Borgia — not the Messiah. But Leo and
Michelangelo didn’t just stop there, they painted all of the people of the
bible to be white, deceiving the entire world of what the people of the book
really looked like.
Over time, these false images have saturated the minds
of the masses to such a degree that the notion of the messiah being black,
sounds like a lie. Many people, especially our people, regard the notion of the
messiah and the disciples being black as an attempt to instill black pride in
our race, rather than considering if it could be true or not. America has brainwashed
us so much that when you try to tell our people the truth, they can’t receive
it because they been taught so long to believe in lies.
And if you’re one of these people who can’t receive
the truth because of your pre-programmed beliefs, then don’t take my word for
it — let’s goes to the scriptures and see what color the messiah was there.
The
Black Messiah in the Bible
His head and hair
were white [pure] like wool, as white as snow, and His eyes like a flame of
fire; His feet were like fine brass, as if refined in a furnace, and His voice
as the sound of many waters. – Revelation 1:14-15
In the verse above, John reveals to us how the Messiah
will look when he returns to bring judgement to the world. He states that the
messiah’s hair is white (meaning pure) and woolly and that his feet are similar
to brass that was burnt in a furnace. Brass is already brown, like a doorknob,
so anything burned has to get very dark from oxidation. And since His feet were
the same color as the rest of his body, that means his skin complexion was dark
brass.
This is exactly the color that Josephus described him
as being. But let’s go to the so-called old testament of the bible and get
another witness of how the messiah appears.
“I watched till thrones were put in
place, and the Ancient of Days was seated; His garment was white as snow, and
the hair of His head was like pure wool. His throne was a fiery flame, its
wheels a burning fire. – Daniel 7:9
In the verse above, Daniel agrees 100% with John that
the messiah has pure woolly hair and we all know that we — black people — are
the only ones with woolly hair. So don’t let America continue to fool you into
thinking that the messiah was white; it is a lie from the pits of hell that
they have been brainwashing our minds with ever since we arrived here.
Some might say, “well so what if the Messiah is black,
color doesn’t matter” but that is an ignorant point of view. If color didn’t
matter, then why did they go through all of the trouble to paint our Messiah
their color? Obviously color matters! If it didn’t, they would have left him
black, and told our ancestor’s the truth about who the people of the book were.
Instead, they told them lies so they could pass those lies down to us in hopes
that we would never find out that Yahusha (whom the world calls Jesus) was
black and that we are God’s chosen people, whom the entire bible was written
about.
Jesus is a Jew, a black man just like his people and
nation the Africans who look similar to the Israelites and the God of Israel
expresses this in the Bible book of Amos 9:7 Are you not as children of the
Ethiopians unto me, O children of Israel? saith the LORD... Remember in Genesis
1:26, God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness:...
What about our brothers and sisters with white skin
that we see daily in Jesus films that call themselves the Jewish nation? Truly
they are synagogues of Jews, Synagogues of satan their god (White Jesus aka
Cesare Borgia)
False Images of Christ
Cesare
Borgia
Jesus Christ
Cesare Borgia is in the book entitled Triptych of
Poisoners, and is also in the book entitled Cesare Borgia His Life and Times by
Sarah Bradford. Between 1502 and 1503, he employed Leonardo da Vinci as a military
architect and engineer, in which him and Leonardo da Vinci became intimate
instantaneously, they were lovers. To express his love towards Cesare, Leonardo
painted many pictures of him. Cesare's Father Rodrigo Borgia, who later became
Pope Alexander VI, under the authority of the Catholic Church Elite, had his
son picture put up as Jesus Christ in the Western World. Cesare had sex with
his own sister Lucrezia, and he killed his brother Giovanni in 1497, and this
is the man whom the Catholic Church gave their consent
to allowing his picture to be put up and portrayed as Jesus Christ to deceive
the whole world to think Christ was European. See what most people don't
know is, there was a competition during the time called the Renaissance period,
between Leonardo da Vinci and the well known Michelangelo. The competition was
to see who could impress the king by a making a new image of the King's son
that would deceive the world, in which Leonardo da Vinci won the competition.
The original King James Bible of 1611 had the Apocrypha in it, but in 1928 under the Vatican, they
made an agreement to take 14 books out of the King James holy bible. Why you
might ask, well because thousands of years before they put this image up to be
Christ, they found out that it was written of in the Wisdom
of Solomon located in the Apocrypha, that they would do this and the
reason for it. So knowing this was written of in the Wisdom of Solomon, the
Roman Catholic Church took it out of the bible so the people wouldn't figure
out their deception. It is a noted fact that when they did this, they knew exactly what Christ people really looked like, they
knew Christ and his people were not Europeans, but instead were actually
Hebrews, who were dark brown people. So let's find out in the bible
first what Satan was going to do, and then will find out what exactly was
written in the Wisdom of Solomon that the Apocrypha had to be taken out and
credited as unscriptural and not divinely inspired, by the Catholic Church.
Question: So what is written of in the bible that
Satan would do?
Revelation 12:9 - And the great dragon was cast out,
that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world:
he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
FYI: So it is written that Satan would deceive the
whole world, in which he is doing this through the Catholic Church and through
the so called children of God called the Jews, who are really the children of
Satan according to Revelation 2:9 and 3:9. So now we know Satan plan is to
deceive the whole world and we know that through the Catholic Church and the so
called Jews are whom he is using to execute his plan. So now lets examine what
was written in the Apocrypha that was so critical to our knowledge, that it had
to be taken out and defamed as being unbiblical and not divinely inspired.
Question: This image that we see is said to be Christ
and is portrayed all over the world as Christ, but says the word of God about
it?
Wisdom of Solomon 14:8 - But that which is made with
hands is cursed, as well it, as he that made it: he, because he made it; and
it, because, being corruptible, it was called god.
FYI: Scripture says that which is made with hands is
cursed, but why would it be so? Isaiah 2:8 - Their land also is full of idols;
they worship the work of their own hands, that which their own fingers have
made: Because the image that they put up, they called it Christ, which
therefore it not being Christ made it a curse and a sin unto them because they
themselves made it with their own hands and fingers. So therefore by calling it
Christ, they give glory unto another and not the true and living God, therefore
they worship it and give honor to it as being God which makes it idolatry. So
being corruptible, this image was called God, so when the true people would
begin to desire to learn about Christ, they would be told hey worship this guy,
then they would ask who is he, and they would be told he's Christ.
Question: What else is written?
Wisdom of Solomon 14:9 - For the ungodly and his
ungodliness are both alike hateful unto God.
Wisdom of Solomon 14:10 - For that which is made shall
be punished together with him that made it.
FYI: So the image that the Catholic Church allowed to
be put up as Christ, will be destroyed, and also them and everyone who had a
hand in pushing this deception unto the people, so there is a judgement
awaiting them. They didn't do this to be nice, they had a motive behind pushing
this deception which was mentally driving them to push a belief into the
mindset of the people, in which they were pushing this during the Renaissance
period.
Question: So now knowing that this image is idolatry
and an idol of the heathens, what else is written about this?
Wisdom of Solomon 14:11 - Therefore even upon the
idols of the Gentiles shall there be a visitation: because in the creature of
God they are become an abomination, and stumbling blocks to the souls of men,
and a snare to the feet of the unwise.
FYI: So by them doing this, they are an abomination
unto God because in doing so, this image would become a stumbling block to the
souls of men, and a snare to the feet of the unwise, how so? Because they knew
Christ and his people wasn't European, so they knew that if they put up images
of European people, then the true people would think the images are actually
the people they are reading of in the bible. They knew they would open their
bibles and see all these images of people who didn't resemble their skin color,
but yet would see their family following this man who is supposed to be Christ,
and see them believing that the people in these images were actually the people
of Christ, and would feel excluded from the bible. So then they knew the true
people would vary away from the bible and lose interest in it because they
would consider it to be the white's man book, which this was part of their plan
it's psychology at its best form. Because without a race having any biblical
connection to coincide with their spirituality, they therefore will have no
identity which would reverse their perception of self into a form of hatred
towards others of their skin tone. Which is why black on black crime is high,
because they can't look at each other and see they are one, which is also why
our people learn to hate themselves and fight each other, but love all those
who hate them, thus creating a stumbling block to the souls of men.
Question: So in the creation of this images and other
images portraying Christ and his people as European, what came from this?
Wisdom of Solomon 14:12 - For the devising of idols
was the beginning of spiritual fornication, and the invention of them the
corruption of life.
Wisdom of Solomon 14:13 - For neither were they from
the beginning, neither shall they be forever.
FYI: So in creating the false images of Christ and his
people as Europeans, and worshipping them as Christ and his people, doing so
was the beginning of spiritual fornication. Why, because now when the people
are not yet of Christ but learning of him, they are actually loving other gods
whom the people aren't espoused to, so therefore they cheating on the true
Christ with other gods spiritually, because they giving them time and love and
affection and praise and worship as if they are the true Christ. But these
images weren't here in the beginning, and neither shall they remain upon the
earth forever.
Question: So how did these false images get here?
Wisdom of Solomon 14:14 - For by the vain glory of men
they entered into the world, and therefore shall they come shortly to an end.
FYI: Scripture says by the vain glory of men these
images entered into the world, and surely they shall soon come to an end in
this world.
Question: So where does Cesare Borgia and his father
Rodrigo Borgia come in the picture?
Wisdom of Solomon 14:15 - For a father afflicted with
untimely mourning, when he hath made an image of his child soon taken away, now
honoured him as a god, which was then a dead man, and delivered to those that
were under him ceremonies and sacrifices.
FYI: A Father afflicted with untimely mourning, thats
Rodrigo Borgia, when he made an image of his child, thats in reference to his
son Cesare, image put up to be Christ, which is how they honored him as a God
though he was unknown at the time in Rome, thus making him dead. They used this
false image of Cesare as Christ, and they brought forth a false teaching and
ceremonies and sacrifices and holidays all along with this image, to deceive
the people to believe these things were of this guy whom they were portraying
as Christ.
Question: So what else came along with this the false
Christ?
Wisdom of Solomon 14:16 - Thus in process of time an
ungodly custom grown strong was kept as a law, and graven images were
worshipped by the commandments of kings.
FYI: From this false image, an ungodly custom grown
strong was kept as a law, and that custom was Christmas, in which they told you
it was the birthday of Christ. And they made Jesus pictures and Mary pictures
and crosses and all forms of idolatry to resemble biblical things to appear
European to support their demonic intentions.
Question: What else is written?
Wisdom of Solomon 14:17 - Whom men could not honour in
presence, because they dwelt far off, they took the counterfeit of his visage
from far, and made an express image of a king whom they honoured, to the end
that by this their forwardness they might flatter him that was absent, as if he
were present.
FYI: Not everybody could honour this guy in the image
as Christ in person, because some of the people lived far away. So they took
this false image of Christ back to their native lands with them, and they made
unto themselves images of other gods whom they could honor closely, so that
they may worship their respective god in the images as if they were present.
What did the people do? 2 Kings 17:29 - Howbeit every nation made gods of their
own, and put them in the houses of the high places which the Samaritans had
made, every nation in their cities wherein they dwelt. Proved that!
Question: What else is written? Wisdom of Solomon
14:18 - Also the singular diligence of the artificer did help to set forward
the ignorant to more superstition.
Wisdom of Solomon 14:19 - For he, peradventure willing
to please one in authority, forced all his skill to make the resemblance of the
best fashion.
FYI: Now remember the competition during the time
called the Renaissance period, between Leonardo da Vinci and the well known
Michelangelo, was to see who could impress the king by a making a new image of the
King's son that would deceive the world, in which Leonardo da Vinci won. So by
him winning and creating with his hands this false image of Christ, he set
forward those who had not knowledge of this, meaning he caused them to have an
irrational belief arising from ignorance of not knowing who this guy is that
they are really worshipping. So Leonardo being willing to please Rodrigo
Borgia, the Pope in authority at the time also the father of Cesare Borgia, he
compelled all this talent to make the image resemble his son Cesare Borgia in
the best way possible.
Question: What else is written?
Wisdom of Solomon 14:20 - And so the multitude,
allured by the grace of the work, took him now for a god, which a little before
was but honoured.
Wisdom of Solomon 14:21 - And this was an occasion to
deceive the world: for men, serving either calamity or tyranny, did ascribe
unto stones and stocks the incommunicable name.
FYI: So after impressing him, the multitude of people
were drawn by the elegance and beauty of this image, and accepted it and took
it to be their God, which beforehand wasn't revered by all as a God. And the
reason they did this, was to deceive the world, and men begin to attribute this
image and give credit to it, by not revealing to others who this guy is that’s
suppose to be God, thus fulfilling Revelation 12:9 - And the great dragon was
cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the
whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with
him. So satan with the help of the Catholic Church has deceived the whole world
into thinking this image is Christ, when it's really Cesare Borgia. What did
Satan say? Isaiah 14:14 - I will ascend above the heights of the clouds; I will
be like the most High. So through this false image of Christ, Satan gets the
glory as if he was God, like he said. So now you see why the Catholic Church
took the Apocrypha out of the holy bible, they didn't want to get exposed, but
little did they know I would come along one day.1. The whole world is deceived,
they got this image on movies, cds and dvds, t shirts, key chains, necklaces,
bracelets, ornaments, stockings, pictures, coffee mugs, pens, air fresheners,
wrist bands, watches, rugs, bill boards, windows, and even tattooed on their
body, thinking it's Christ when really it's Cesare Borgia.
Question: So what should the people know and do?
Deuteronomy 4:15 - Take ye therefore good heed unto
yourselves; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day that the LORD spake
unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire:
FYI: Ask yourself, if the people didn't see no image
of Christ, but only heard the voice of the words, then how did they know what
he looked like? Because as I just proven, the images that were given
by the Catholic Church are suppose to be Christ, but yet they don't
look as how the bible says Christ looked. Who is the racists? Same devils!
Question: Why should they take good heed, what if they
make them a similitude and say it's Christ?
Deuteornomy 4:16 - Lest ye corrupt yourselves, and
make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or
female,
FYI: Deuteronomy 4:15 warned us to take heed because
we never saw what Christ looked like, and Deuteronomy 4:16 tells us why,
because if we make ourselves a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the
likeness of male or female, we are corrupted. What is a graven image? Graven
Image - a material effigy that is worshipped as a god. So those who have the
blonde hair blue eyed picture who is suppose to be Christ, and those who have
the black face dreadlock hair picture who is suppose to be Christ, and those
who have any picture that is suppose to be Christ, you are corrupted and an
idolatry worshipper. Bible describes Christ and his people as people of color,
but that doesn't give no one the right to make an image of what the bible says
they look like. Repent before you burn in hell!
Question: What else does the scripture say?
1 John 4:12 - No man hath seen God at any time. If we
love one another, God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us.
FYI: No man hath seen God at anytime, so how is it
that the world has pictures who they say is God, and believe they are God,
despite the scripture saying no man hath seen God at anytime?
Revelation 12:9 - And the great dragon was cast out,
that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world:
he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.
FYI: Because the devil has deceived the whole world!
If your pastor has a picture that is suppose to be Christ in the church, or
home, or condones them in society as being Christ, he is a false prophet come
out from among him and be ye separate.
2 Corinthians 4:13 - We having the same spirit of
faith, according as it is written, I believed, and therefore have I spoken; we
also believe, and therefore speak;
FYI: We have the same spirit of faith, according as it
is written, we believe, therefore we speak whats written, so if it's not
written that Christ was white with blonde hair and blue eyes, then how do you
have faith if what you believe is not written? You not even saved!
Macquirelatory - If what color he was didn't matter,
then it wouldn't have been described in the bible, and when John turned, he
would have said I didn't see no color, I just see Christ. But the color of his
skin is not what’s going to save us Hebrews or the Gentiles, having the spirit
of God and worshipping God in spirit and truth is what’s going to save us all.
But don't play ignorant.
Revelation 2:9
I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but
thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which
say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Jewish people are Edomites like most white people but
they converted to Judaism in 700AD they are not real Jews.
Jeremiah 14:2
Judah mourns, and its gates languish; they are black
unto the ground;.. The word black in Hebrew is qadar which means 'Dark Skinned'
Revelation 3:9
Behold, I will make them of the
synagogue of Satan, which say they are Jews, and are not, but do lie; behold,
I will make them to come and worship before thy feet, and to know that I have
loved thee.
And
it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one Sabbath
to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the LORD. Isaiah
66:23
It shall come, that I
will gather all nations and tongues; and they shall come, and see my glory.
Isaiah 34:8
#AllNatonsForChristJesus #ETCOutreach
Author: Evangelist Thankgod Chimenem Wanyanwu, Adherent of the African Cultural Religion
No comments:
Post a Comment